- #X plane world traffic install update
- #X plane world traffic install Patch
- #X plane world traffic install full
- #X plane world traffic install Offline
The benefits of the online stuff won’t ever outweigh that for them.Come experience why real pilots fly X-Plane. The thing with XP that people will always love compared to MSFS is the feeling of being more in control of what’s going on. MSFS has lots of upsides in terms of what the connectivity brings, but it is always going to infuriate those that haven’t accepted the downsides.Ĭonversely, the X-Plane business model and way of updating, with having to rebuy the sim every 5 or so years and then breaking some 3rd party compatibility isn’t ideal either.
#X plane world traffic install Patch
Having a DVD and deciding to patch it later when you’re good and ready is a selling point in a way.
#X plane world traffic install update
You want scenery streaming, detailed cities, easy multiplayer, complex online weather, real-world traffic? Well then, welcome to ‘your sim is now going to update regardless of your feelings’. It’s a big set of various trade-offs that many people just don’t like.
#X plane world traffic install Offline
XP would probably be a be a better offline experience.Īs well as just pure internet speed or reliability, it’s also a bit of a chasm of thinking in terms of how dependent on online services they want their sim to be. These people are to flight simming what flat-Earthers are to science.Īnd I agree. And these “ XP is KING, Austin is GOD” folks still speak of it as if it was still in that same shape it was at launch. Anyone who claims otherwise had needs to remove their heads from the sanctuary of their anuses. And the SDK was horrible, and was for the entire first year after launch. As good as MSFS may have looked at launch, it was buggier than week old roadkill on a Texas highway. I hear many people - including 3rd party XP devs - who talk about MSFS as if it was still in the same state is was at launch. The tribalism though is hard to understand. XP would probably be a be a better offline experience. We’ve already seen tons of complaints about people with very slow / unreliable Internet connections complain about how bad MSFS is without that functionality. When it comes to online functionality, also completely valid. They want to continue using what they have. Ditto for folks with thousands invested in ortho, scenery, planes, etc. Porting stuff over to MSFS would be a fool’s errand IMHO. If I had spent hundreds of thousands of hours building a cockpit for a particular plane (like the Zibo 737 or HotStart TBM for example) and have it 100% functional and it all works beautifully, there’s no reason to make the switch.
The 3 points right there that say it all. Have invested a lot in hardware/cockpits and 3rd party titles ….The moats of helicoptors, ortho scenery, tubeliners is hard to defend over time, so the people that love XP-11 are probably solid customers of XP-12. It’s fun to root for the little guy, and the world would be a lesser place with just a single flight sim franchise doing well. ‘Microsoft Flight’ and all that has been sort of pushed into the cupboard under the stairs). ‘David & Goliath’ tribal team stuff, as Laminar are clearly flight sim fans and Microsoft has had a pretty rocky track history over the last 40 years with the FS series (e.g. I think it’s a completely valid argument for them, and XP is going to be the best bet for that way forward I think. Those that have bad bandwidth or just don’t agree with the concept of a connected app. The retail on the FlightFactor 757 is $99, and you’re not going to get a decent 737-600 for $30 on that side of the island. That stuff is not inexpensive and XP-11 is a good platform for it imho. Have invested a lot in hardware/cockpits and 3rd party titles, and it works today.
#X plane world traffic install full
Really the holdouts will be people with full on tubliner home cockpits that may have hardware that’s not fully MSFS compatible.Īgreed, I think XP 12 is going to have a solid customer base in the future of people that:
0 kommentar(er)
